Highsnobiety
Double Tap to Zoom

Chanel just lost its four-year trademark dispute against Huawei over accusations that one of the Chinese telecom giant’s logos was too similar to the Maison's famous double Cs.

On Wednesday, the General Court of the European Union in Luxembourg dismissed Chanel's action on the grounds that the logos used for the two brands have enough distinct differences so as not to cause confusion. The court held that “the marks were dissimilar overall and that, accordingly, the opposition had to be rejected."

The tribunal remarked that the visual differences in the two logos were significant. "The mere fact that they have the geometric shape of a circle cannot make them conceptually similar," it said. "In particular, Chanel’s marks have more rounded curves, thicker lines, and a horizontal orientation, whereas the orientation of the Huawei mark is vertical. Consequently, the General Court concludes that the marks are different."

This is not the first time the courts have remarked on the lack of similarity between the contested logos. In fact, the trademark squabble between the companies began in September 2017 when Huawei sought approval from the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), a trademark body, to register its computer hardware trademark which has two vertical interlocking semi-circles.

Chanel objected, saying that the design was similar to its registered French logo of two horizontal interlocking semi-circles. However, in 2019, the trademark office dismissed Chanel’s objection, saying there was no similarity and no likelihood of confusion in the mind of the public. The French luxury house subsequently challenged the initial decision, which resulted in Wednesday's ruling.

In its report on the case, Reuters accurately stated that the “trademark spat underlines how luxury brands jealously guard their signature logos and trademarks that often symbolize luxury, style, and exclusivity to millions of people worldwide.” Chanel's obsession with protecting its logo – and destroying anything that vaguely resembles it – only illustrates the dependence on scarcity and exclusivity within the luxury sector.

The General Court of the European Union's ruling also marks a huge victory for Huawei on the international stage. The Chinese tech giant had recently become the poster child of the Trump administration’s war on Chinese “intellectual property theft,” amid an escalating trade war between China and the US.

We Recommend
  • Bode's Retro Nike Football Shoes Are Just as Good the Second Time Around
    • Sneakers
  • Y-3's Admirable Flat Sneaker Just Went Full Ballet Shoe
    • Sneakers
  • 2024 Saw Huge Creative Director Reshuffles, but 2025 Is When the Fun Begins
    • Style
  • Finally, It's Confirmed! Matthieu Blazy Joins Chanel
    • Style
  • Is Louise Trotter’s Carven Departure the Start of a Great Designer Reshuffle?
    • Style
  • Nothing Is Happening at Chanel & It's All Anyone Can Talk About
    • Style
What To Read Next
  • This Is Not Issey Miyake's First Sneaker. But It Is Its Best
    • Sneakers
  • Thrashable or Not, Nike's Air Force 1 "Skate Shoes" Are Certainly Lookers
    • Sneakers
  • Handbag of the Year? Moschino's Pepperidge Farm Cookies
    • Style
  • High-Octane Dressing? 'White Lotus' Talent? Burberry's Been Right On the Money
    • Style
    • sponsored
  • Nike's Low-Profile Jordan 1 Finally Gets the Crisp "Royal" Treatment
    • Sneakers
  • A Brief Guide To Skatewear Essential Brands To Have In Your Rotation
    • Street Style