Who'd have guessed that boarding a plane in 1983, with a wicker basket carry-on, would lead to Walmart casually discombobulating fashion's most prestigious talisman, 40+ years later? Not Jane Birkin, I'd imagine.

Quietly released over Christmas, through third-party vendors online, the Walmart Birkin – or Wirkin – would swiftly sell out via word-of-mouth, and instigate what is already poised to be one of the new year's defining debates surrounding the state of luxury.

Because of it, TikTok's ablaze with bittersweet Hermès collectors, wealth anarchists, and internet scholars alike, heatedly discussing what it tells us about an already volatile market, and society at large.

Though quickly identifiable as such, the $80 knockoff is beyond popular. So much so, dupes of the dupe have since emerged, alongside other lookalikes, like a Kelly clone, consoling whoever missed out on what was the fauxriginal Walmès.

Because not only have virtual shelves been plucked empty, but Walmart's taken down links to its Wirkins altogether, probably to appease the French leather goods maker ahead of legal repercussions – a move said to have only further rarefied the replica, inadvertently.

Yet to officially comment, this is hardly the first imitation-flattery-forgery issue Hermès has had to mitigate. However, it feels amongst its culturally meatiest.

It's fair to question and critique both morality and lawfulness of counterfeiting another's creation. But the more interesting conversation to be had here might have to do with where stunts like these leave luxury's image, and what tarnishing it means for business – in 2025 specifically.

One viral-gone observer believes it's a reflection of what's happening in plain sight: the industry's quaking in its boots, grasping at straws as it justifies to educated customers ever-rising, supersized markups, in an age when everything can and will be copied for less, by and for those that prioritize meta-messaging over an item's functional, artisanal properties. It's a case study on how class, aspired affluence, and social symbolism dictate taste.

Hermès certainly contributed to such mind games, enforcing wait lists, five-figure prices, minimum spending amounts, et cetera. But have they pushed their luck? Was the timing of their 60 Minutes segment really coincidental?

Can snackable info on their tentpole product somehow assuage an increasingly skeptical audience? Skeptical of what they've been manipulated into craving; of what they're paying for when shopping high end; of the hoops they must jump through to do so.

When the people explicitly want a Wirkin, decorate it with thoughtful trinkets just like the late Jane Birkin herself, even claim she'd have preferred the budget-friendly fake over the blueprint that can cost 100 times as much, and requires numerous rites of passage to procure – then you know something's awry.

While there's no consensus, perhaps the deeper gesture at stake is to defy a system that is anti-democratic by design, rather than simply antagonize, deceive or cosplay the rich.

To some at least, the gist is that ubiquity and mass-access deflate the desire to purchase a real Hermès. This renders the artificial scarcity that protects the original meaningless, thus reducing its value. And with that, schadenfreude ensues.

But so, is the Walmart Birkin an It Bag in its own right? Can it sustain the hype? Will the fraud replace its source material? Doubtful.

What it will do, or has already done, is prove a point. Even more than Telfar's "Bushwick Birkin" before it, the Wirkin exemplifies in terms that are graspable to every tier and territory of consumer that fashion is a language of codes – one that thrives on our efforts to appear fluent in it.

Want to keep browsing? Download the Highsnobiety App for early access to limited-edition product drops on the Highsnobiety Shop. Highsnobiety has affiliate marketing partnerships, which means we may receive a commission from your purchase.